Applies to all personnel supported by NSF grants
As a result of the America COMPETES Act, NSF implemented a training requirement for Research Misconduct effective 1/4/10. The requirement is for institutions to develop and implement a Research Misconduct training policy for undergraduates, graduates and Post-Doc researchers "supported" by NSF sponsored research. Please note: "NSFOIG will view support in the same context that supported is used when provided as acknowledgement on a publication. Thus salaries, supplies, materials, etc." per Peggy L. Fischer Associate Inspector General for Investigations, Office of Inspector General, NSF.
This has become one of the Certifications and Assurances the Sponsored Research Office endorses every time a NSF proposal is submitted. The awardee institutions "bear primary responsibility for prevention and detection of research misconduct and for the inquiry, investigation, and adjudication of alleged research misconduct."
Trouble viewing the above? On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research (Second Edition) - read for free online now!
According to NSF OIG, Research Misconduct is defined as the following:
(a) Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in proposing or performing research funded by NSF, reviewing research proposals submitted to NSF, or in reporting research results funded by NSF.
1. Fabrication means making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
2. Falsification means manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
3. Plagiarism means the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results or words without giving appropriate credit.
4. Research, for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, includes proposals submitted to NSF in all fields of science, engineering, mathematics, and education and results from such proposals.
(b) Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
An institution must:
a) have a training plan (pdf) established to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research. Per the Grant Proposal Guide, the College's certification to this is required for each proposal,
b) training plans are not required to be included in the proposals to NSF, but NSF has advised institutions that the training plans are subject to review upon request,
c) institutions must designate one or more persons to oversee compliance with the RCR training requirement and
d) institutions are responsible for the verification process in asserting undergrads, grads and Post-Docs supported by NSF have received training in RCR.
The College has established an initial plan for the Responsible Conduct in Research training protocol and is developing verification processes. All NSF supported undergraduate students, Graduate Students,Post-Docs must take the appropriate training modules provided by CITI. Additionally, advanced training will be required according to discipline.
The NSF RCR training matrix (pdf) has been added to the Grant
Office/Preaward website but remains a work in progress. It is the College's intention to work with
students, faculty, and staff to continuously improve the initial plan so that we
may provide broader training in the proper conduct of research to include other
ethical academic and business practices common in the University
In the meantime, NSF Beta Sites for Resources on Ethics Education in Science and Engineering are available:
The Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering .
Additional resources are available at the Office of Research Integrity website.