Notice of Non-Discrimination
Unless otherwise constrained by law, William & Mary is committed to providing an environment for its students and employees that is free from discrimination based on any personal factor unrelated to qualifications or performance such as, without limitation, race or color, citizenship, national origin or ethnicity, ancestry, religion or creed, political affiliation or belief, age, sex or sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability, marital status, pregnancy status, parental status, height, weight, military service, veteran status, caretaker status, or family medical or genetic information. William & Mary also provides reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities as required by law.
The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the university’s non-discrimination policies, to receive discrimination/ harassment complaints from members of the university community, and to monitor the institution’s compliance with non-discrimination laws and regulations:
Kiersten L. Boyce, J.D., CCEP
Chief Compliance Officer, Title IX and ADA/504 Coordinator
108 James Blair Hall
College of William & Mary
Williamsburg, VA 23185
- disparate treatment
- disparate impact
- sexual harassment
- failure to accommodate
Related links to information about reporting and complaints are also provided.
For easy reference, W&M provides a (downloadable) poster showing campus resources for people experiencing or having questions about discrimination or harassment.
The Office of Diversity & Equal Opportunity provides online training on Preventing Workplace Harassment.
The university is committed to providing a discrimination and harassment-free environment for its students and employees. This commitment is expressed in W&M's foundational policies: the Code of Ethics and Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. The primary, central policy about discrimination is the Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Policy. This Policy covers sexual harassment as well.
Additional discrimination-related policies and procedures are collected on the university's policy library under "Discrimination-Related Policies and Procedures."
Discrimination Guidance - Information about Types of Discrimination including Harassment and Retaliation
What is discrimination?
When someone is treated differently because of their race, sex, or any other protected trait, that may be discrimination. There are several different forms of discrimination: disparate treatment discrimination, disparate impact discrimination, harassment (with some unique elements for sexual harassment), and retaliation. In addition, failure to provide reasonable accommodation for individual's religious practices or beliefs or for qualified individuals with disabilities is another form of discrimination.
Disparate Treatment Discrimination - A person with decision-making authority takes a protected trait into account in an employment or academic decision made. This can be the result of racial (for example) animus – an active bias against individuals possessing a certain characteristic. It can also be the result of unconscious bias, or stereotyping. Examples include:
- A supervisor assigns workloads based on the race or national origin of employees.
- A professor grades students with disabilities more harshly than other students.
- A university administrator allows time off to attend services to members of one religion, but not to members of another.
- A hiring manager drops a candidate from consideration because of the candidate’s caretaker responsibilities.
- An instructor gives all the intellectually challenging assignments to males.
- A university refuses to admit students of a particular ethnicity.
In order for a decision or action to constitute disparate treatment, it must have a significant impact on the student or employee. If the action does not have enough effect to constitute disparate treatment discrimination, it could be part of a hostile environment, if there are other negative actions being taken. This is discussed under harassment, below.
Disparate Impact Discrimination - This type of discrimination exists where a policy or practice of the university that appears neutral – that is, that does not appear to differentiate based on a protected trait – results in a difference in the way a benefit or service or work opportunity is provided to individuals of a certain race, national origin, sex, or other protected trait. In some cases, these types of policies or practices are legitimate, even if they do have a disparate impact.
Some examples of policies that could create a disparate impact include:
- A performance evaluation policy that considers how much sick leave an individual has taken to care for children.
- A personal appearance policy requiring men to be clean-shaven, since such a policy has a disproportionate negative impact on African-American men.
A practice that affects more African-American employees (for example) than white employees because the the practice is applied only in a particular department that is largely staffed by African-American typically would not constitute disparate impact discrimination.
This type of discrimination is uncommon at institutions like William & Mary. Most discrimination in the workplace (or educational setting) takes the form of disparate treatment, harassment, or retaliation.
Harassment - Discriminatory harassment is a form of discrimination, and so violates William & Mary policy. The university defines discriminatory harassment as unwelcome conduct that has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with a person's work or educational performance or participation in a university program or activity, or is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work or educational environment. Often, harassment takes the form of words and actions that create a hostile or offensive work or educational environment.
In order for harassment of a student or employee to be a violation of university discrimination policy, the conduct must be because of or based on an irrelevant personal factor, as defined in the Policy on Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation. If a hostile environment exists for some other reason, that would be a matter for a supervisor, Human Resources, a Dean or the Provost, or the Dean of Students.
Harassment based on sex – sexual harassment – can take a different form, and so is often described separately from other forms of discriminatory harassment.
W&M provides online training on Preventing Workplace Harassment.
Sexual Harassment – Sexual harassment can occur in the form of a hostile or offensive environment, like other forms of discriminatory harassment. Sexual harassment also occurs in a form unique to sexual harassment, commonly called "quid pro quo" harassment. The university's Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Policy defines the different forms.
Here are some examples of what may constitute sexual harassment, as defined by university policy:
- A student receives a poor grade for failing to submit to a teaching assistant's demands for sexual favors
- Sexual innuendo renders a classroom discussion so pervasively hostile that students are unable to focus on the discussion
- Residents of a dormitory repeat sexual taunts and repeatedly leer at members of the opposite sex, rendering the workplace dormitory hostile and intolerable
- Students who refuse to engage in pervasive sexual banter are excluded from a university activity.
W&M provides online training on Preventing Workplace Harassment.
Retaliation - Retaliation is another form of prohibited discrimination. Retaliation is adverse action taken against an employee (including a faculty member) or student for opposing discrimination (including harassment) or complaining of conduct reasonably believed to constitute discrimination or otherwise participating, in good faith, in a discrimination complaint or investigation.
Prohibited retaliation can take many forms, including:
- A supervisor bullying an employee who filed a discrimination complaint against the supervisor
- Members of a department isolating or ridiculing a colleague because she initiated a sexual harassment investigation against a member of the department
- A fraternity or other student group posting flyers across campus accusing a student who filed a sexual assault charge against a member of the fraternity/group of lying, referring to the accusing student by name
- A department head excluding a professor from department meetings because the professor filed a complaint of salary discrimination based on her gender
- A supervisor refusing to provide a recommendation for an employee with a good performance record after the employee filed an equal pay act lawsuit against the university
- A program director refusing to speak to a student participating in the program because the student alleges that the university engaged in racial discrimination by failing to provide the student with scholarship funding to participate in the program
- A supervisor giving an employee a negative performance evaluation because the employee’s wife filed an age discrimination claim against the university
The above examples are provided for illustration and education only; in all cases the conduct or action in question is considered in context under the standards set forth in university policies and procedures. Additional information is available in a handout for employees who participate in an internal investigation, answering frequently asked questions about retaliation.
This guidance is about discriminatory retaliation -- retliation against someone for opposing discrimination in some way. There are other activities that are protected from retaliation. For example, the Faculty Handbook prohibits retaliation by a faculty member against anyone making a good-faith allegation of misconduct. But other forms of retaliation are not dealt with under discrimination policies and procedures.
There are two types of protected traits or characteristics that universities are required to accommodate -- to make reasonable modification or alterations to practices or work or educational conditions. These are disabilty and religious beliefs and practices.
Individuals with disabilities are entitled to accommodation under William & Mary's Employee Reasonable Accommodation Policy and Procedure and Student Disability Accommodation Policy and Procedure. The ADA Coordinator also provides guidance about the rights of applicants and employees with disabilities .
Employees and students are entitled to have their religious beliefs and practices accommodated, unless accommodation would create an undue burden. Examples of accommodations include allowing employees to schedule breaks to accommodate prayer times and modifying standards of dress.