Responsibilities and Organization
Roles and Responsibilities
The Design Review Board oversees design implementation in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan. The DRB reviews all construction, exterior renovation and landscaping projects for conformance with the College's architectural guidelines. The DRB may recommend design elements for architects to consider as projects move through the design phases. Specifically, the DRB will make recommendations at three states: Site Selection, Schematics and Preliminary Design.
Authority
The Design Review Board is advisory to the President of the College who remains subject to the oversight of the Board of Visitors (BOV).
Composition
Board Membership shall include: *
Chair, BOV Building and Grounds Committee
One Member of the Buildings and Grounds Committee
Vice President for Administration
Director of Facilities Management (President's Designee)
Director of the Historic Campus
Chair of the Landscape, Energy and Environment Committee
Colonial Williamsburg Architectural Historian
University Architect from selected university on a rotating basis
* The Board may call upon experts as needed.
Options for Operating Policies and Procedures
I. Structure
Eight Members
Chair – Chair of Buildings and Grounds
Vice Chair – Vice President for Administration
II. Meetings
Quorum: Five members one of whom is either Chair or Vice Chair. Members may be present by phone
Record: Minutes will be kept by staff.
Votes: Simple majority of those present
Meet as required
III. Scope of Action
A. Location
Changes to exterior of any College facility
B. Project Size
Major and minor changes to facades of buildings
IV. Staffing
Senior Planner, Office of Administration
Associate Director of Facilities Management for Planning, Design and Construction
V. Submissions
Standard architectural presentations would include at a minimum:
• Building footprint
• Elevations for all four sides
• Demonstration of compliance of the order and elements of the building with guidelines
Standard site selection presentations would include at a minimum:
• Topographical map of sites considered with footprints imposed
• Selection criteria
• Advantages and disadvantages of each site


